Activity for trichoplax
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #292888 | Initial revision | — | 26 days ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Need Help Setting Up Email Verification in Codidact Since you mention setting this up on your local machine, I assume this is a development environment, intended for your own testing (so the new user you are creating is still controlled by you on your machine rather than another person). If so, instead of emails being sent they will be displayed at ht... (more) |
— | 26 days ago |
| Comment | Post #292564 |
The routes were only in the answer, not the question, because I phrased the question in terms of my initial misunderstanding which didn't know that routes were the answer. I guess that's not ideal for browsing through questions, but at least this one exists now which is explicitly about routes. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292566 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292564 |
I've now added an answer which has some overlap but is more specific to the user profile page. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292566 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How do I add a new route (URL)? You can add a new route in the file `config/routes.rb`, and the existing routes in that file for the other "tabs" on the user profile page show the template to follow. The relevant part of the routes file starts on line 180: ```ruby scope 'users' do ``` Everything inside this `scope` bloc... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292564 |
I struggled through understanding how the routes work myself a few months ago, so I wrote a [self answer](https://collab.codidact.org/posts/291607/291608#answer-291608) for next time I need to work on them.
It covers the things I got confused by, and might be a way to get started and then narrow d... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292414 |
Post edited: Describe user specifically as a database user |
— | 3 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292414 |
Thanks for explaining - I was wrong about how that command worked with passwords. I've edited the answer to remove references to passwords, so now it's just about making sure the user mentioned in `database.yml` exists. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292414 |
Post edited: Remove reference to password, that was my misunderstanding |
— | 3 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292414 | Initial revision | — | 3 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What does this failure involving mysql on Mac mean? It looks like you are using a database user `root`. I suspect this is at least part of the problem, so I recommend fixing it first. If you look in the QPixel repository at the file `config/database.yml` you should see the database username and password that QPixel is trying to connect with (for me... (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292409 |
You're welcome. I think `text` is actually invalid, but the response to an invalid language choice is to apply no syntax highlighting, which is what I want.
I did also try `bash` first, and it changed a few subtle things but still had so much inconsistency that I thought plain text would be easier... (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292409 |
Post edited: Fix typo, add tag, remove struggling syntax highlighting |
— | 3 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #292409 |
Suggested edit: Fix typo, add tag, remove struggling syntax highlighting (more) |
helpful | 3 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292409 |
> I was able to again connect to my Qpixel database from the command line
To narrow things down, could you show the command you used for this? (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291665 |
Post edited: Explicitly remove syntax highlighting from pseudocode and bash output for clarity |
— | 5 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #291665 |
Suggested edit: Explicitly remove syntax highlighting from pseudocode and bash output for clarity (more) |
helpful | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291608 |
Post edited: Include information about the view |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291608 |
I didn't write this up the first time it confused me, but having been confused again months later, I thought writing it up might help it stick in my memory... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291608 |
Post edited: Formating |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291608 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Cannot find definition of function that returns a path The function `commentthreadpath` is created automatically by Rails, based on the information provided in `config/routes.rb`. See Rails Routing from the Outside In for further details. Specifically, line 236 of `config/routes.rb` says (enclosing scope included for context): ```ruby scope 'co... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291607 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
| Question | — |
Cannot find definition of function that returns a path I want to find the place in the codebase where a path is defined, but searching for the function that creates it gives no results apart from the usage of that function. For example, see `thread.html.erb`, line 142: ```ruby . ``` This calls a function `commentthreadpath` but searching for t... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #287707 |
Post edited: Remove section that is now covered by the installation guide |
— | 7 months ago |
| Edit | Post #287707 |
Post edited: Add section on Gnome terminal and remove unused styling |
— | 9 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289259 |
I've also been seeing this message since starting to work on QPixel (I'm also using RVM). It has never caused any problem so I haven't got around to asking whether I need to do anything about it. I'm using Fedora 38 (which you have already reported in the question).
Just mentioning to confirm it's... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287707 |
Post edited: Move disclaimer below heading so heading shows in the table of contents in the question |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288973 |
I spotted the fact that the editor preview did not show the bug, and mentioned that in the bug report, but I didn't check mobile. Thanks for pointing that out - I'll edit it into the bug report on Meta. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288973 |
Post edited: Typo plus tidying |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #288973 |
Suggested edit: Typo plus tidying (more) |
helpful | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288973 |
I've raised the problem with the [code block extending off the right hand side of the post](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288974) which affects the expandable details section of this post. Mentioning so anyone else who spots it knows they don't need to raise it. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288809 |
I'm adding this as a comment as I don't have an answer to the main part of your question (hopefully someone else can answer that).
In answer to your second question, yes that message is triggered when the site is running in development mode. When run in production mode the message is not there, re... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288051 |
Post edited: Explain deliberate typo |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288051 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288051 |
Post edited: Add code without lines that were rejected on initial posting |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288051 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
Is the difference in Codidact's CDN guidance intentional? Codidact has a [guide to installing Co-Design]. The section "Using a pre-built version" recommends using a [CDN]. I notice that the CDN recommended in the guide is different to the CDN used in the Codidact source code: - The guide uses `unpkg.com` - The source code uses `cdn.jsdelivr.net` The... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287809 |
Testing whether I can add a comment during [this bug](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288047). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #286955 |
Post edited: Add details HTML tag as a substitute for a spoiler |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287809 |
The first time the description is generated (before caching) it shows up in the HTML as a string. If it's supposed to be serialised in the cache I'd expect the cache string to be longer (it only seems to have a few characters dedicated to the "value" section which seems an unrealistic compression rat... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287809 |
Post edited: Add in results of using this question to test production |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287809 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Rails cache returning empty string I'm trying to understand the root cause of a bug, HTML meta tag for description is not question specific. On any individual question page, instead of showing an excerpt of the question and top answer, the description found in the `` tag is the standard default back up description. For example, on ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287795 |
That's the trouble with things that are always present - they stop standing out... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287795 |
In production it needs to be `https` for security, so that only the signed in user can save things in their own name.
QPixel is already set up to detect when it is in development (for example, it displays ["This site is in development mode"](https://collab.codidact.org/uploads/ozglhtq1rs9zy30nbsi7... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287795 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
"Confirm my account" link shows as https in development As instructed in the "Create administrator account" section of the QPixel Installation guide I created a second new user through the user interface (clicking "Sign Up") in my local development instance of QPixel. I then visited `http://localhost:3000/letteropener` in order to see the registration ema... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |