Activity for trichoplax
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #287707 |
Post edited: Add section on Gnome terminal and remove unused styling |
— | 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289259 |
I've also been seeing this message since starting to work on QPixel (I'm also using RVM). It has never caused any problem so I haven't got around to asking whether I need to do anything about it. I'm using Fedora 38 (which you have already reported in the question).
Just mentioning to confirm it's... (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
| Edit | Post #287707 |
Post edited: Move disclaimer below heading so heading shows in the table of contents in the question |
— | 9 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288973 |
I spotted the fact that the editor preview did not show the bug, and mentioned that in the bug report, but I didn't check mobile. Thanks for pointing that out - I'll edit it into the bug report on Meta. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288973 |
Post edited: Typo plus tidying |
— | 9 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #288973 |
Suggested edit: Typo plus tidying (more) |
helpful | 9 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288973 |
I've raised the problem with the [code block extending off the right hand side of the post](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288974) which affects the expandable details section of this post. Mentioning so anyone else who spots it knows they don't need to raise it. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288809 |
I'm adding this as a comment as I don't have an answer to the main part of your question (hopefully someone else can answer that).
In answer to your second question, yes that message is triggered when the site is running in development mode. When run in production mode the message is not there, re... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288051 |
Post edited: Explain deliberate typo |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288051 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288051 |
Post edited: Add code without lines that were rejected on initial posting |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288051 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
Is the difference in Codidact's CDN guidance intentional? Codidact has a [guide to installing Co-Design]. The section "Using a pre-built version" recommends using a [CDN]. I notice that the CDN recommended in the guide is different to the CDN used in the Codidact source code: - The guide uses `unpkg.com` - The source code uses `cdn.jsdelivr.net` The... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287809 |
Testing whether I can add a comment during [this bug](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288047). (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #286955 |
Post edited: Add details HTML tag as a substitute for a spoiler |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287809 |
The first time the description is generated (before caching) it shows up in the HTML as a string. If it's supposed to be serialised in the cache I'd expect the cache string to be longer (it only seems to have a few characters dedicated to the "value" section which seems an unrealistic compression rat... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287809 |
Post edited: Add in results of using this question to test production |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287809 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
Rails cache returning empty string I'm trying to understand the root cause of a bug, HTML meta tag for description is not question specific. On any individual question page, instead of showing an excerpt of the question and top answer, the description found in the `` tag is the standard default back up description. For example, on ... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287795 |
That's the trouble with things that are always present - they stop standing out... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287795 |
In production it needs to be `https` for security, so that only the signed in user can save things in their own name.
QPixel is already set up to detect when it is in development (for example, it displays ["This site is in development mode"](https://collab.codidact.org/uploads/ozglhtq1rs9zy30nbsi7... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287795 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
"Confirm my account" link shows as https in development As instructed in the "Create administrator account" section of the QPixel Installation guide I created a second new user through the user interface (clicking "Sign Up") in my local development instance of QPixel. I then visited `http://localhost:3000/letteropener` in order to see the registration ema... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287786 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
Do seed posts need to be HTML rather than Markdown? In QPixel, under `db/seeds/posts`, there are a number of HTML files which are starting points for various help guides and documents such as Terms of Service and Code of Conduct. These can be edited through the user interface (by admins), at which point they accept Markdown. I've tested one of them... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287707 |
Post edited: Mention using RVM in case relevant |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287708 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Meta: Should Collab have Categories? The front page is less cluttered without "Question" With Q&A containing both questions and wiki posts, every question is labelled "Question", like this: Current Q&A layout, with every question labelled as "Question" If Wiki were a separate Category then the questions in Q&A would not need the ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287707 |
Post edited: Mention storage.yml |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287707 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How to set up a new (development) instance of Codidact/QPixel Installing QPixel on Fedora Linux using RVM without brew If you happen to be installing in this situation, a few things might have different names. Here are some of the differences I had to allow for. Disclaimer: I have no insight or familiarity with QPixel or any of the packages described below.... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287688 |
Thanks for the double explanation. I found `QPixel.user()` previously but I noticed that the first time it is called it makes an AJAX request, which seems redundant if the user is not signed in. So the reason I asked this question is because I was wondering if functions like `QPixel.user()` and `QPix... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287687 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
Checking if the user is signed in from front end code When writing front end code for QPixel, is there a preferred way to check whether the user is signed in? The back end code has access to this information, and constructs the page accordingly. Some page elements are present or not based on whether the user is signed in. The front end code could ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287673 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
Meta: Should Collab have Categories? When creating a new post in the Q&A Category, I'm asked whether I want to create a question or a wiki article. Are these both stored in the Q&A Category for historical reasons, perhaps due to predating the concept of Categories, or is there another reason for having only one Category on Codidact Coll... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287672 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
Meta: Is there an argument for having Collab under codidact.com? Does having Codidact Collab under `codidact.org` rather than under `codidact.com` with the other communities cause an additional administrative burden, for example when releasing code changes? Would there be benefits to having Collab under `codidact.com` with the others? Presumably there would ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #286955 |
Suggested edit: Add details HTML tag as a substitute for a spoiler (more) |
helpful | over 1 year ago |